lauantai 19. joulukuuta 2009

Fitting Prosthetic Limbs, via a Computer



THE best fit for a prosthetic leg depends in part on the small adjustments in alignment that help amputees walk comfortably.
Traditionally, these refinements have been done by a skilled clinician who talks with patients, observes their gait and makes incremental changes to the prosthesis over several visits, looking for the sweet spot where the alignment is optimal, says Andrew L. Steele, who fits amputees for prostheses in Waterloo, Iowa.

“I use a little bit of eye and a little bit of gut” to get the alignment right, he said. “It’s a highly subjective process.”

But Mr. Steele, who is himself an amputee — he lost his left leg below the knee in a farm accident when he was 12 — now has a new alignment tool.

He is trying a computer-based device that provides quantitative information to support his subjective assessment. The device attaches to the prosthetic limb and wirelessly beams information on the twisting of the limb as the patient walks, along with other data, to his computer for analysis.

Mr. Steele has been trying the system, called Compas — short for Computerized Prosthesis Alignment System — not only on his patients, but also on himself. A software program that is part of the system interprets data collected as a patient walks; it then suggests adjustments. Mr. Steele then uses a wrench to change the angle of the prosthesis.


“It’s good to have the background readings from the computer,” he said. “It gives me another tool to narrow down what is causing a problem.”

The new technology may be especially timely, given the large number of returning military veterans who need prostheses.

Compas, a product of Orthocare Innovations of Oklahoma City, was developed in part with financing from the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md.

Louis A. Quatrano, who administers financing for the center, said the device, along with others in development, might provide an alternative for some patients who must now travel to specialized, often distant, gait labs. Instead, they could be tested in the office of a local clinician.

“It might also help with consistency in treatment,” Mr. Quatrano said, when a patient moves from one clinician or prosthetist to another.

Dr. Alberto Esquenazi, director of the gait and motion analysis laboratory at MossRehab in Elkins Park, Pa., says the Compas is part of a new generation of tools that provide objective alignment assessments.

“It is an innovative approach, a real departure from what has been done in the past,” he said.

Dr. Esquenazi and colleagues are also developing a portable alignment system for prosthetists to use in their offices.

Doug McCormack, the chief executive of Orthocare, notes that the Compas has two parts: a $1,500 metal plate installed near the socket of the prosthesis worn by the patient and a $6,500 diagnostic module the prosthetist attaches to the plate during office visits. The module collects and transmits alignment data to the computer as the patient walks.

Doug Bourgoyne has been trying the Compas system for the last few months at the Raymond G. Murphy V.A. Medical Center in Albuquerque, where he is clinical supervisor of the orthotics and prosthetics laboratory. The metal plate looks like a standard metal plate used within a prosthesis, he said, “but it is smarter.”

The plate has silicon strain gauges to measure forces going through the prosthesis, said David Boone, the chief technology officer at Orthocare, and electronics to convert the information to digital form and memory so measurements can be stored.

The diagnostic module that is attached to the plate in the prosthesis during office visits contains a laser to project a line on the floor as the patient walks, and a gyroscope that measures the rotation of the limb, Dr. Boone said. Each module can be used with multiple patients.

Mr. Bourgoyne bought three modules. They are not meant to replace the expertise that he has developed in doing alignments by eye, he said, “but they can augment it by providing numbers.”

DR. QUATRANO cautioned that the Compas would have limitations. “Every individual walks a bit differently,” he said, and has a different injury. “Research will demonstrate where it is most appropriately used.”

Treva Monteith, a registered nurse in Yukon, Okla., has been wearing a Compas plate in her prosthesis since March. The system has saved a lot of time and effort, she said. In an earlier series of fittings, she said, “I had to go in for visits, then go home and walk, then call up, and say, ‘This isn’t right,’ and return for more visits.”

But the Compas alignment process went more smoothly, she said. “I’m very pleased,” she added. “This is a lot quicker.”

Google Loses in French Copyright Case

A French court ruled on Friday that Google infringed copyrights by digitizing books and putting extracts online without authorization, dealing a setback to its embattled book project.
The court in Paris ruled against Google after a publishing group, La Martinière, backed by publishers and authors, argued that the industry was being exploited by Google’s Book Search program, which was started in 2005.

The court ordered Google to pay over 300,000 euros, or $430,000, in damages and interest and to stop digital reproduction of the material. The company was also ordered to pay 10,000 euros a day in fines until it removed extracts of some French books from its online database.

Google said it believed that it had complied with French copyright law and that it planned to appeal the decision.

“We believe that displaying a limited number of short extracts from books complies with copyright legislation both in France and the U.S. — and improves access to books,” said Philippe Colombet, who is responsible for Google’s books partnership in France.

Mr. Colombet said he did not know whether the company would immediately remove the excerpts or pay the fine; Google’s lawyers were still examining the ruling. He also said there would be no impact on Google’s settlement with publishers and authors in the United States, an agreement that would allow the company the right to digitize, catalog and sell millions of books online that are under copyright protection.

La Martinière, based in Paris, first filed the suit in 2006 claiming damages against its publishing houses: Editions du Seuil of France, Delachaux & Niestlé of Switzerland and Harry N. Abrams of the United States.

Those publishers, supported by the French Publishers’ Association and an authors’ group, had argued that scanning books was an act of reproduction that Google should pay for. They had demanded that Google be fined millions of euros.

They accused Google of letting users browse the content without paying for it, and of reaping revenue from advertisers but not adequately compensating the creators and original publishers of the works.

Yann Colin, a lawyer for La Martinière, expressed his satisfaction with the result and said his client hoped that the level of the fine would be increased.

The court, he said, had been “a bit rapid” in its assessment of damages, given that the three publishing houses claim that about 10,000 of their works were infringed.

Google has so far scanned 10 million books through partnerships with libraries in its project to put the world’s literature online. Over half of the books are in languages other than English.

Those include books under copyright, of which only extracts can be previewed free. In these cases, Google directs users to sites where they can buy books or libraries where they can borrow them. Other books are in the public domain and can be read and downloaded free.

The project has proved especially controversial in France. Here, politicians including President Nicolas Sarkozy have pushed for a broader public digitization program, apparently wary of offering Google the chance to capitalize on the country’s cultural heritage.

Mr. Sarkozy pledged nearly 750 million euros earlier this month toward the computer scanning of French literary works, audiovisual archives and historical documents, an announcement that underscored his government’s desire to maintain control over France’s cultural heritage in an era of digitization.

The settlement in the United States outlined a plan to create a database of in-print and out-of-print works. It includes measures to find and compensate authors but covers only books published in North America, Britain and Australia, and any books registered with the United States Copyright Office.

sunnuntai 13. joulukuuta 2009

easy like sunday evening

Hello yall…

It is sunday evening and my daugther has gone to sleep and the wife is making her hair in the bedroom, finally i have some time for my self and my tech toys. I've got this cool new MacBookPro 17" as work computer and im thinking that what games should i install on it??? or should i do it at all???

I also found out last week that our university is been hit by some script-kiddy and some bullshit virus, the "cracker" calls himself "Promish" the fun part is that the virus is basically total bullshit virus. I actually think that i know who the so called "cracker" is, the only question is that should i burn the "cracker's" ass.

Lately i've been thinking a lot of opening my own website where i could make some money. Do you guys have any ideas of what kind of website would be profitable???

tomorrow is back to work… and 2 exams on next week also, Cisco CCNA 2 written exam and C++ exam also… hopefully it will go well, really don't have that much energy or motivation to make more exams…

Cr3sc0